What are these screenings based on?

These online screenings are inspired by existing scientific and clinical frameworks and are not an official administration of a diagnostic instrument. No copyrighted questionnaires have been reproduced; all questions are original wording aligned with the underlying constructs.

Autism screening

DSM-5-TR (American Psychiatric Association, 2022)

Provides the A1–A3 and B1–B4 domain structure on which this screening's categories are conceptually based.

View source

ICD-11, Chapter 6A02 Autism spectrum disorder (WHO)

International classification that supports the description of characteristics and the emphasis on functioning across different contexts.

View source

NICE guidelines CG142 and CG128 (autism in adults and children)

Supports the principle that screening is not a diagnosis, and outlines which steps do belong to a full diagnostic process.

View source

Autism Spectrum Quotient (Baron-Cohen et al., 2001) and AQ-10

Conceptual inspiration for measuring social skills, attention to detail, communication and imagination. The questions in this app use original wording.

View source

RAADS-R and RAADS-14 (Ritvo et al.)

Inspiration for combining social, sensory and developmental items into a single profile.

View source

Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS-2, Constantino & Gruber)

Conceptual basis for representing social reciprocity on a scale, rather than as a yes/no outcome.

View source

ADOS-2 and ADI-R domains

Inspiration for distinguishing between observable behaviour, developmental history and current lived experience.

View source

CAT-Q, Camouflaging Autistic Traits Questionnaire (Hull et al., 2019)

Conceptual basis for the separate masking domain: compensation, camouflaging and assimilation.

View source

Sensory Profile research (Dunn, 1997 and later)

Supports the distinction between hypersensitivity, hyposensitivity and sensory-seeking behaviour.

View source

Dutch Autism Register and Dutch Association for Autism

Context on lived experience, prevalence and the path to diagnosis in the Netherlands.

View source

ADHD Traits

ASRS v1.1 (WHO Adult ADHD Self-Report Scale) — conceptual inspiration

View source

Social anxiety

DSM-5-TR, social anxiety disorder (APA, 2022)

View source

Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale — conceptual inspiration

View source

Obsessive-compulsive symptoms (OCD)

DSM-5-TR, obsessive-compulsive disorder (APA, 2022)

View source

Y-BOCS (Goodman et al., 1989) — conceptual inspiration

View source

NICE CG31 — OCD and body dysmorphic disorder

View source

Trauma & chronic stress

DSM-5-TR, PTSD and related disorders (APA, 2022)

View source

PCL-5 (Weathers et al.) — conceptual inspiration

View source

Mood & Depressive Characteristics

PHQ-9 (Kroenke et al., 2001) — conceptual inspiration

View source

Sleep & sleep deprivation

Insomnia Severity Index (Morin) — conceptual inspiration

View source

Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (Buysse et al., 1989)

View source

NHG guideline on sleep problems and sleeping medication

View source

Burnout & overload

Maslach Burnout Inventory (Maslach & Jackson) — conceptual inspiration

View source

Burnout Assessment Tool (Schaufeli et al., 2020)

View source

High sensitivity

Highly Sensitive Person Scale (Aron & Aron, 1997) — conceptual inspiration

View source

Sensory Processing Sensitivity research (Greven et al., 2019)

View source

Other neurodivergent traits

DSM-5-TR, specific learning disorder and motor disorders (APA, 2022)

View source

Adult Dyslexia Checklist (Vinegrad, 1994) — conceptual inspiration

View source

Yale Global Tic Severity Scale — conceptual inspiration

View source

What an online screening cannot assess

  • Professional observation of behaviour across different situations
  • A complete developmental history from early childhood onward
  • Information from parents, caregivers or other close contacts (collateral history)
  • A clinical interview conducted by a qualified professional
  • Differential diagnosis: distinguishing from ADHD, anxiety, OCD, trauma and mood disorders
  • Assessment of functioning across multiple contexts (home, work, study, relationships)
  • Contextual factors such as culture, language, gender, life stage and current stress load